This is a post from a friend's facebook page. It's just your average little piece of witticism, not quite Oscar Wilde, but it made me smile. I suspect that when I return to my news feed, that it will have several more :"likes" from our sizable contingent of artsy, politically minded friends who share an interest in spiritual matters.
Perhaps, not as many as this:
I wouldn't have thought twice about it, probably, were it not for the comment below it.
Now, the commenter is somebody I have never met before in my life. I know nothing about her, and she seems to have tried to be polite about what she has to say, and is trying to convey that she is not judging my friend. This is something that probably means something to him. He was raised in an extremely conservative family, and later broke with his former church is a very drastic way. A lot of people from his early life are no longer speaking to him.
But her comment really got under my skin. Maybe the perceived dismissive of her tone got to me, or the fact that she didn't bother to support her claim with evidence. I'm no scientist, and I know that people don't memorize the source of where they heard or read something. But it seems to me like it was warranted here.
Now, I firmly believe that Jesus wasn't that political. You could interpret that he was crucified in part for not being political enough. If I remember correctly, the crowd turned against him in part because many Jews expected the coming of God to signal the end of Roman rule, right? People were seemingly willing to believe that the dude was God made flesh, or sent by God himself/herself, but when he didn't want to overthrow the government and "set them free" (AKA: Leave them to form their own government based on their current set of religious laws and beliefs) they let the current despised government nail him to a piece of wood to bleed to death.
But according to the Bible, he did do all those things the quote mentions.
It's hard to hear "Love thy neighbor as thyself" or "Turn the other cheek" and think: "Unless they are wearing a different uniform than you, or if their country and your countries can't agree on a peaceful solution. Then you can kill them." So, yeah, in my opinion, Jesus was anti war.
And the last time I checked the most Jesus ever took from one of the people that he healed was a free meal. And with Jesus there was no need for BYOB, what with the whole water into wine thing. At any rate, he certainly didn't charge them. If anything, he asked for them to "pay it foward" as it were. And he certainly gave away a lot of free food. Of course, it was magically created, but still, I don't think you needed a green stamp to get a fish head if you were at ther sermon on the mount. And he didn't discriminate when it came to who he helped either. He helped non Jews, money lenders, hookers, criminals. Pretty much anyone who came to him in earnest was helped. Even some people who weren't even looking for redemption found it. So I don't think that the whole argument about government programs to provide for the poor being bad because it helps lazy people who don't deserve it can be supported by Jesus' example.
Aesop's fables, maybe. But I'm pretty sure Aesop wasn't a good Christian boy. Though, he was apparently a slave.
I don't know that Jesus could be called a socialist in the truest sense of the word. Miriam-Webster defines
Socialism as:
1
: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2
a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3
: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
But where do we draw the line between caring for the poor and making everybody equal? We could say that you want the government to help the poor without punishing the rich, but the Bible is full of instances where people don't learn their lesson until some really awful things happen to them. More than one parable, I believe, ends up with a rich man who wasn't sufficiently humble losing everything while the poor a rewarded for just being poor and having suffered. Now, I'm not saying it's going to do your soul any good if you give to the poor because the government requires it. And I definitely don't think all rich people are bad, or that they need to be punished. But I'm just saying, it's really hard to use Christianity as an excuse NOT to give money and care to those who are impoverished. Now if you want to get into a debate about whether Obama's health care plan is the best way to do that, good. But that is a separate topic. And honestly, one on which I am not as well informed. Or if you want to discuss separation of church and state, I would welcome that discussion. But lets keep those topics separate in our minds, please.
And if you really think that Jesus looked like this:
Then I think you need to do your
research. (Also, maybe it's time to examine the origins of Christmas trees, Easter bunnies and eggs, and the time of year in which we celebrate these holidays. Maybe next go round.)
Now, I suppose that this is probably way too much effort to put into replying to an offhand comment from some random on facebook. And I could have just put my own pithy reply beneath hers and been done with it. Or I could walk away entirely. But damn it, I don't want to. I think I, and the gentleman my friend was quoting make a valid point. Jesus would want us to do all those things and support others doing them. I'm sick of people hijacking a religion that proclaims to be about tolerance, love, humility, and helping your fellow man unconditionally and using it as an excuse to demean others and maintain the status quo. To dismiss alternate interpretations and beliefs and institutionalize their opinions when it's convenient. I'm definitely tired of keeping quiet about it.
So, in conclusion. I give you, Stephen Colbert.